🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence comparable discussions in other member states